abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Материал доступен на следующих языках: English, español, français, 日本語, 한국어, 简体中文, 繁體中文

Брифинг

6 Июл 2023

Unpacking clean energy: Human rights impacts of Chinese overseas investment in transition minerals

См. все теги

Shutterstock (licensed)

In the next decade, China is set to play a central role in the global transition to clean energy. This will require significant overseas investment in transition mineral mining, giving China an important responsibility to ensure the energy transition is not only fast, but also fair to workers and communities most directly impacted by Chinese overseas investments. This briefing underlines the significant improvements required in the practices and approaches of Chinese mining companies if they are to successfully contribute to the rapid, just energy transition our world needs, and to the wider social goals of the Belt and Road Initiative.

This analysis highlights the scale and scope of human rights and environmental abuses linked to Chinese companies’ operations overseas. From January 2021 to December 2022, a total of 102 allegations of abuse were recorded by the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (Resource Centre). These allegations of abuse sit alongside similar alleged abuses by North American and European companies recorded in the Resource Centre’s Transition Mineral Tracker (TMT), as well as other reports on the human rights and environmental impacts of renewable energy supply chains in the Andes, Southeast Asia, Kenya and South Africa, highlighting the risks of irresponsible business practices for vulnerable local communities, Indigenous Peoples and migrant workers around the world.

Despite important advances promoted by the Chinese Government and the mining business association (CCCMC) on overseas corporate responsibility, the overall findings of this briefing suggest human rights and environmental risks in transition mineral supply chains associated with Chinese companies, including exploration, extraction and processing, are significant.

Key findings

  • Indonesia has the highest number of recorded allegations of abuse (27), followed by Peru (16), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (12), Myanmar (11) and Zimbabwe (7).
  • Over 2/3 of the allegations (69) involve human rights abuses against local communities. The most salient risks concern impacts on livelihoods, Indigenous Peoples’ rights and insufficient or lack of consultation.
  • Over half (54) of the allegations involve negative environmental impacts, where water pollution, effects on wildlife and species habitat and issues with access to water access are frequently recorded.
  • More than 1/3 of the allegations (35) concern workers’ rights. The majority link to health and safety risks in the workplace.
  • Despite the significant number of recorded allegations, only seven of the 39 companies have published human rights policies, indicating significant room for improvement in both policies and practices.

Key recommendations: Just transition to clean energy

As these findings illustrate, further and urgent action is required to mitigate the growing risk of human rights harm related to transition mineral extraction. Lack of company action risks lost public support, conflict, suspensions, delays and rising costs – something our planet can ill-afford. A different approach, one which centres human rights and promises a swift and just transition, can be built around three, key principles:

  • Shared prosperity to build public support;
  • Robust human rights and environmental due diligence to mitigate social and environmental harm;
  • Fair negotiations to build a stable investment environment.

As demand for transition minerals to fuel green technologies remains a global priority, the scope for human rights infringements by mining companies and their investors remains a major concern. Therefore, commitment to such principles has never been more important.

Impacts on local community & attacks against civil society organisations (CSOs)

Each allegation can be associated with more than one category of impact. Figures represent the number of times an impact was recorded across 102 allegations.

69

allegations

Impacts on local community & attacks against civil society organisations (CSOs)

34

allegations

Impacts on livelihoods

28

allegations

Indigenous rights

23

allegations

Insufficient/inadequate consultation

Environmental impacts

Each allegation can be associated with more than one category of impact. Figures represent the number of times an impact was recorded across 102 allegations.

54

allegations

Environmental impacts

24

allegations

Water pollution

23

allegations

Impacts on wildlife/species habitat

21

allegations

Access to water

Impacts on workers

Each allegation can be associated with more than one category of impact. Figures represent the number of times an impact was recorded across 102 allegations.

35

allegations

Impacts on workers

24

allegations

Occupational health & safety

Further reading

"Going out" responsibly: The human rights impact of China's global investments

Read our 2021 briefing on the human rights impact of China's global investments

Just energy transition principles for human rights in business and investment

Our recommendations for companies, investors and governments

More on Chinese investment overseas

Explore guidance, cases and company resources for Chinese companies overseas