abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

4 二月 2025

作者:
Heidi Hautala and Phil Bloomer, Reuters

Comment | Why Europe must hold its nerve on raising the ESG bar for business

"Comment: Why Europe must hold its nerve on raising the ESG bar for business," 4 February 2025

With the inauguration of President Donald Trump, and his agenda of narrow economic nationalism, Europe faces hard choices. The new U.S. president inevitably emboldens similar voices in Europe too. Together they stoke fears that Europe’s economies are uncompetitive and ossified, about to be run over by the “animal spirits” unleashed in the U.S. by blanket deregulation, arbitrary tariffs and convenient myopia on our ecological crisis.[...]

Commissioner Ursula von der Leyen made a serious concession to corporate lobbies in November with an “omnibus” package [...]

The new regulation, which is now denounced as a “bureaucratic burden” despite its emphasis on smart and focused action, is there to create trust that companies can be a force for not only profitability but also for good. If we now abandon these principles, we abandon them at our peril as public trust erodes.

It is vital to gain the trust of citizens and consumers that the products and services they buy do not originate from child labour or the reckless destruction of the environment. To dismantle laws, or even fall back on discredited voluntary guidelines, would be a betrayal of citizens’ legitimate expectations of governments to direct markets towards shared prosperity and the common good. Another element of trust is that companies have the right to expect legal certainty and predictability from lawmakers.[...]

The views of responsible companies that have called for mandatory rules instead of failing certifications should be heeded. A coalition of companies, including Unilever, Nestle and Mars state that opening the legislation could undermine investment.[...]

More than 150 business and human rights professionals wrote to the commission counselling against opening the primary legislation.[...] Similarly, 170 civil society organisations have appealed that “the EU should not undo the progress that has already been achieved”[...]

After years of an assertive Brussels Effect (in which many smart European standards have been adopted by business worldwide), it would signal a loss of confidence, leadership and direction. Thus the omnibus initiative, if pursued, needs to be confirmed as a limited effort to strengthen further the guidance for the excellent social and environmental regulations now enshrined in European legislation.

属于以下案件的一部分

EU: Development & implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Transposition & 'Omnibus' Updates

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。