abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

故事

10 四月 2025

EU: "Unprecedented" lobbying from financial sector left industry "largely exempt" from CSDDD, says report; incl. co. non-response

...The financial lobby at the European level managed to largely exempt the financial sector from the supply chain law. This unprecedented lobbying success should be undone as part of the ongoing revision of European rules for sustainable financial markets...
Finanzwende

In March 2025, Finanzwende published a report alleging the French government secured large-scale exemptions for the financial sector in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive in response to lobbying from companies and banking groups.

The report says that, initially, the CSDDD proposal included the financial sector, requiring them to conduct due diligence on companies they finance or invest in. The report says this received support from several industry bodies (with conditions), including the European Banking Federation, the Dutch Banking Federation and the Germany Investment Funds Association.

However, the report says “intense lobbying” by BlackRock and “influential lobbying groups” led to the removal of due diligence obligations for asset managers from the Directive. It says lobbying occurred despite the fact the financial industry was “split on the issue of CSDDD”, with some groups arguing for a “more nuanced” approach than others.

The report says this exemption later expanded to cover banks and insurance companies. Banks, insurance companies and asset managers therefore were required to assess risks in their own supply chains rather than the companies they finance. The report said this left the financial sector largely “unaccountable for the environmental and human rights risks associated with its core business”.

...This is a disgraceful example of how special interest groups can secure significant carveouts in European legislation, despite the objections of a majority of members of parliament and member states...
Finanzwende

The report highlights concerns that the European Commission’s “Omnibus package” plans to make the financial sector’s exemption permanent, by removing the CSDDD’s review clause which required considering the finance exemption after two years.

In April 2025, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited BlackRock to respond to the report. It did not respond.

企业回应

BlackRock

没有回应

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。