abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

3 四月 2025

作者:
Amnesty International

Kenya: Meta can be sued in Kenya for role in Ethiopia conflict

查看所有标签 指控

"Kenya: Meta can be sued in Kenya for role in Ethiopia conflict", 3 April 2025.

In response to the High Court ruling that it has jurisdiction to hear and consider the merits of the case, in which Meta is accused of promoting content that led to ethnic violence and killings in Ethiopia from 2020 to 2022, Mandi Mudarikwa, Head of Strategic Litigation at Amnesty International, said:  

“Today’s ruling is a positive step towards holding big tech companies accountable for contributing to human rights abuses. It paves the way for justice and serves notice to big tech platforms that the era of impunity is over...

“This ruling offers hope that marginalized groups can access justice no matter where they are in the world. The idea of looking at countries outside the US and Europe as mere markets where profits can be made in the absence of accountability must be challenged...

The case filed against Meta raises substantial questions of law regarding Facebook’s use of algorithms and its impact on rights protected by Kenya’s Bill of Rights and broadly in international and human rights law. Since Courts in Kenya are vested with jurisdiction to determine whether a right has been violated and to interpret the constitution among other things, the Court confirmed that it had jurisdiction to hear the matter on this basis. The Court went on to say that, as stipulated by section 165 of the Constitution of Kenya, such cases that raise substantial issues of law must be heard by an uneven number of judges therefore the matter has now been sent to the Chief Justice for empanelment or the appointment of the judges to hear the matter. After the Court handed down its decision, Meta’s legal representatives asked for the Court’s permission to appeal and continue to seek dismissal of the petition...

The petitioners argue that the Facebook platform’s algorithms amplified inciteful, hateful and dangerous content which contributed to significant human rights violations.  

Meta challenged the jurisdiction of Kenyan courts, arguing that their terms of service restrict claims against them to US courts.    

Kenyan courts have previously allowed trials in cases where former Facebook content moderators sued Meta for unlawful dismissal...

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。