abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

非政府组织回答

18 三月 2024

作者:
Migrant Justice

Migrant Justice's rejoinder to response from Ahold Delhaize and Hannaford

.....Hannaford has resisted calls from farmers and farmworkers to join the Milk with Dignity Program since 2019, despite well-documented labor abuses and severe human rights violations on the farms producing Hannaford-brand milk. Migrant Justice’s campaign has received support from national faith organizations, labor and climate groups, agricultural organizations, legislators, and thousands of Hannaford customers who have sent emails, written postcards, made calls, and attended rallies.

[....]

Migrant Justice has documented cases of physical abuse, substandard housing, discrimination, rampant health and safety violations, and retaliation on farms that sell to Hannaford's suppliers.

Without adequate training or protection from retaliation, Hannaford’s standards of engagement offer these workers no meaningful protections.

Further, in the case of one worker, the retaliation he faced for speaking up was damaging enough that not only did he leave the area, but such events have had a chilling effect on other workers who might consider raising concerns. In such an atmosphere, an absence of complaints should not be considered as evidence that all is well.

[...]

While both of these industry groups [National Milk Producers Federation and the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy] may do good work in their area of expertise, neither has an explicit focus on protecting the human rights of workers ...

[...]

The FARM self-assessments are likely a useful tool for farmers. But they are by no means structured to prioritize human rights. FARM standards are a collection of suggestions for best practices for creating an HR manual and becoming “an employer of choice” – this is not about workers’ rights or protections.

[...]

So far in Migrant Justice’s conversations with workers on northeast dairy farms, the only consequence of Hannaford’s engagement has been the posting of “Restricted Access” signs, which workers viewed as retaliatory and an attempt to bar advocates from visiting them in on-farm housing – not resolving or providing remedy to any of the issues raised.

As key rights-holders, workers should be engaged in the process of assessments. Instead, workers report being unaware of any such assessment and have not been consulted, even in cases where they have reported violations via Hannafords’ Speak Up line.

[...]

Full response attached below

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。