abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

28 二月 2025

作者:
Mary Kaitany, Knowclick meida (Kenya)

Kenya: Safaricom and Becton Dickinson fined $4000 for unauthorized use of customer ID

查看所有标签 指控

“Safaricom Fined Sh250,000 for Unauthorized use of Customer ID”, February 28, 2025

A landmark ruling has seen Safaricom and Becton Dickinson (BD) fined Sh.250,000 each for unlawfully using a customer ID. This case highlights the growing importance of Kenya’s Data Protection Act and its enforcement. The incident reveals gaps in corporate data practices and sets a precedent for accountability. The case arose when Catherine Murithi, an employee of Becton Dickinson (BD), submitted her national ID and personal documents as part of her onboarding process on August 16, 2021. BD requested her to convert her personal Airtel line into a corporate Safaricom number, following company policies. However, after terminating her employment on September 30, 2024, BD shared her ID with Safaricom to transfer the line back to her name—without informing her. Safaricom processed the request without obtaining Murithi’s consent or verifying her authorization. Feeling that this action violated her rights, Murithi filed a complaint with the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC)…

Data Commissioner Immaculate Kassait investigated the complaint and found both Safaricom and BD guilty of violating the Data Protection Act. The violations included:

  1. Ignoring Consent Requirements: BD transferred Murithi’s data without her explicit consent.
  2. Lack of Transparency: Safaricom failed to inform her about the data transfer.
  3. Unlawful Data Processing: Both entities mishandled her personal information, infringing on her privacy.

Each company was fined Sh.250,000, totaling to Sh.500,000, signaling the seriousness of data privacy violations. Commissioner Kassait emphasized that organizations must adopt robust data protection measures to avoid such breaches…

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。