abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

故事

2012年1月25日

Human Rights First & OWNI Digital articles on surveillance technology & oppressive regimes

In November 2011, Human Rights First published a blog entitled "Excuses, excuses: Surveillance Technology and Oppressive Regimes", alleging that companies providing surveillance technology to oppressive regimes in the Middle East contribute to human rights abuses. 

In December 2011, OWNI Digital Journalism published an article entitled "SpyFiles: Revelations of a Billion-Dollar Mass Surveillance Industry", listing companies whose equipment is allegedly sold to and used by repressive regimes.

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited companies mentioned in the articles above to respond.  Company responses and non-responses are listed below.

Adaptive Mobile response [DOC]

Amesys response [DOC]

Area response
 [DOC]

Blue Coat Systems response

Creativity Software response [DOC]

Ericsson response [PDF]

Hacking Team did not respond

Hewlett Packard response [DOC]

Huawei response

NetApp response

NICE response [DOC]

Nokia Siemens Network response [DOC]

Trovicor response [DOC]

Qosmos response

Sophos (owner of Ultimatico Safeware) response 

Verint did not respond

企业回应

Nexa Technologies (formerly Amesys) 浏览回应
Ericsson 浏览回应
Memento Labs (formerly Hacking Team)

没有回应

Hewlett-Packard (HP) 浏览回应
Huawei 浏览回应
Qosmos (part of Enea) 浏览回应
Trovicor 浏览回应
Verint

没有回应

时间线