abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2015年10月21日

作者:
Susan Aaronson, Axel Berger, Marjoie Chorlins, Celeste Drake, Fredrik Erixon, Dan Ikenson & Phil Levy, Cato Institute (USA)

Will the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Live Up to Its Promise? — Session I: Taking Stock of the Issues

What is at stake in these negotiations?  Why are some issues more difficult to resolve than others, and how can compromise be reached?  This panel will identify the low-hanging fruit, the sacred cows, and everything in between to provide a better understanding of the issues under negotiation, from the easiest to most difficult and consequential.  Given the comprehensive nature of the agreement, there is room for debate on a number of topics, such as regulatory coherence, investor-state dispute settlement, privacy and data flows, financial services, government procurement, agriculture, services, labor and the environment, and, of course, tariffs.  So what exactly is on the table, and what positions, if any, have both sides taken?

时间线