abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

法律诉讼

2017年7月17日

California communities’ lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies (re climate change compensation)

状态: ONGOING

提诉日期
2017年7月17日
未知
小区
申诉地点: 美国
事发地点: 美国
诉讼类型: Domestic

企业

bp 英国 油、气、煤
ConocoPhillips 美国 油、气、煤
Chevron 美国 油、气、煤
ExxonMobil 美国 油、气、煤
Eni 意大利 油、气、煤
Marathon Oil 美国 油、气、煤
Occidental Petroleum 美国 油、气、煤
Pemex 墨西哥 油、气、煤
Shell plc 英国 油、气、煤
Equinor (formerly Statoil) 挪威 油、气、煤
TotalEnergies (formerly Total) 法国 油、气、煤, 能源
Marathon Petroleum 美国 油、气、煤

Sources

Snapshot: In 2017, three local governments in California filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fueld companies, including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. They allege defendants were aware of the impact of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They seek compensation for current and future costs of adapating to the consequences of climate change. The case is ongoing.

On 17 July 2017, three local governments in California (San Mateo County, Marin County, and the City of Imperial Beach) filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, Shell and Statoil.

They allege that the companies knew about the impacts of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They are seeking compensation for the current and future costs of adapting to the consequences of climate change, such as sea level rises.

According to Shell, climate change should be addressed through sound government policy and cultural change not by the courts. Statoil pointed out that previous lawsuits of this type had been dismissed for being a political, not a judicial, issue.

On 16 March 2018, a US District Court ruled that California state courts were the appropriate setting for the climate lawsuits.  The oil and gas companies targeted by the lawsuits had argued that the matter should be transfered to federal courts.  The companies have six weeks to appeal.

In May 2020, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's decision to remand the case to state courts.

时间线