abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

内容有以下的语言版本: English, 日本語

故事

Colombian “blood coal” victims file OECD complaint against European energy companies with Dutch National Contact Point

PAS

On 20 April 2023, SOMO, PAX, and La Asamblea Campesina del Cesar por la Restitución de Tierras y el Buen Vivir filed an OECD complaint against RWE AG, Uniper SE, Engie SA, Vattenfall AB, HES International, Havenbedrijf Amsterdam NV, and Havenbedrijf Rotterdam with the Dutch National Contact Point (NCP).

The groups argue that the four electric utility companies with coal-fired power plants in the Netherlands and the three logistics companies involved in coal trade in the Netherlands failed to comply with the OECD Guidelines in the context of adverse human rights impacts associated with forced displacements in the Cesar mining region of Colombia.

From 1996 to 2006, residents of the mining region suffered from paramilitary violence - over 3,000 people were killed and tens of thousands displaced from their land. US-based Drummond and Swiss-based Glencore, the companies operating the coal mines, expanded the mining activities onto the land from which the displaced victims were forced to flee. The claimants argue that the victims still have not received redress and that human rights defenders opposing the project continue to be threatened or killed.

According to the complaint, European companies failed to take action to address these human rights violations despite knowledge of the abuses in their supply chains. The organisations claim that the energy companies were directly linked to and to this day contribute to the adverse impacts of forced displacement and unlawful expropriation of land.

RWE, Uniper and Vattenfall are members of Bettercoal, a coal buyer-led industry initiative working towards responsible global coal supply chains. However, the claimants argue that none of the actions taken by Bettercoal have been effective in actually mitigating the adverse impacts of forced displacement or decreasing the risk of impacts continuing.

In April 2023, Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited RWE AG, Uniper SE, Engie SA, Vattenfall AB, HES International, Havenbedrijf Amsterdam NV, Havenbedrijf Rotterdam, and Bettercoal to respond. RWE AG, Vattenfall AB, HES International, Havenbedrijf Amsterdam NV, and Havenbedrijf Rotterdam responded. After initially declining to comment, Engie SA responded in September. Uniper SE and Bettercoal declined to comment.

On 21 August 2025, the NCP published its initial assessment regarding HES International, Havenbedrijf Amsterdam NV, and Havenbedrijf Rotterdam, accepting the complaint against these three companies for further investigation and offering to mediate, which the Port of Amsterdam and Port of Rotterdam accepted.

As of September 2025, NCP decisions on whether or not to accept the complaint against RWE AG, Uniper SE, and Vattenfall AB are still pending. The complaint against Engie SA was withdrawn by the complainants.

Company responses and non-responses are available below. We will indicate here if we receive any additional responses.

企业回应

Vattenfall 浏览回应
Engie (formerly GDF Suez) 浏览回应
Uniper

没有回应

Havenbedrijf Rotterdam (Port of Rotterdam) 浏览回应
Havenbedrijf Amsterdam (Port of Amsterdam) 浏览回应
Bettercoal

没有回应

HES International 浏览回应

时间线