abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

故事

Companies respond to "Defending rights and realising just economies: Human rights defenders and business 2015-2024"

Over the past decade, human rights defenders (HRDs) have courageously organised to stop corporate abuse and prevent business activities from causing harm – exposing human rights and environmental violations, demanding accountability, and advocating for rights-respecting economic practices.

From January 2015 to December 2024, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (the Resource Centre) recorded more than 6,400 attacks across 147 countries against people who voiced concerns about business-related risks or harms. This is close to two attacks on average every day over the past ten years. In 2024 alone, we tracked 660 attacks.

Additional key findings include:

  • Attacks against HRDs occurred in relation to almost every business sector in every region of the world.
  • Mining, agribusiness and fossil fuels were the sectors connected with the highest number of attacks.
  • Nearly three quarters of attacks targeted climate, land and environmental defenders. This includes a severe crackdown on the right to protest by governments across the globe.
  • One in five attacks were on Indigenous Peoples, despite comprising only 6% of the world’s population.
  • Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia and the Pacific have consistently been the most dangerous regions for HRDs raising concerns about corporate harm, accounting for close to three in four total attacks recorded.
  • There have been more than 530 instances of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) brought or initiated by private actors against HRDs raising concerns about business since 2015.
  • The highest numbers of attacks occurred when people raised concerns about social and enviornmental risks or harms associated with large business projects, and governments and/or companies attempted to suppress dissent. The projects associated with the highest number of attacks over the past decade have been the Lake Albert oil extraction and development project (which includes the East African Crude Oil Pipeline) (Uganda and Tanzania), Inversiones los Pinares (Honduras), Dakota Access Pipeline (USA), Las Bambas mine (Peru), and Line 3 Pipeline (USA and Canada).
  • Attacks on HRDs and restrictions on civic freedoms are bad for business. They prevent companies and investors from accessing crucial information about human rights risks and impacts, increasing operational, financial and reputational risk.

We invited Brasil BioFuels, the Interoceanic Corridor of the Tehuantepec Isthmus (CIIT), Inversiones los Pinares, Empresas Públicas de Medellín (EPM), Grupo EMCO Holding, TotalEnergies, TotalEnergies Uganda, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC), Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC), Minera Las Bambas, Minerals and Metals Group (MMG), China Minmetals, CITIC Metal, Guoxin International Investment, Energy Transfer, Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum, Enbridge, Lin Vatey, Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel (CGN), Solway Group, PT Makmur Elok Graha (MEG), Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd, Export-Import Bank of Korea, Ternium, Technit Group, Indorama Agro, IFC, EBRD, ADB and Citigroup to respond.

Brasil BioFuels, the Interoceanic Corridor of the Tehuantepec Isthmus (CIIT), TotalEnergies, TotalEnergies Uganda, Minera Las Bambas, Minerals and Metals Group (MMG), Energy Transfer, Enbridge, Solway Group, Ternium, IFC, EBRD, ADB and Citigroup responded; their responses are available below.

The other companies did not respond.

企业回应

Brasil BioFuels 浏览回应
Solway Group 浏览回应
PT Makmur Elok Graha

没有回应

Minera Las Bambas (JV between MMG (62.5%),Guoxin International Investment Co. Ltd (22.5%), and CITIC Metal Co. Ltd (15.0%)) 浏览回应
Corredor Interoceánico del Istmo de Tehuantepec (CIIT) 浏览回应
Techint Group

没有回应

Ternium (part of Techint Group) 浏览回应
Citigroup 浏览回应
EPM (Empresas Públicas de Medellín)

没有回应

Lin Vatey

没有回应

Daewoo E&C

没有回应

Export-Import Bank of Korea

没有回应

Inversiones Los Pinares S.A. (part of Grupo EMCO Holding)

没有回应

Grupo EMCO Holding

没有回应

China Minmetals

没有回应

中信金属

没有回应

CNIC Corporation Limited (former Guoxin International Investment)

没有回应

Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel (CGN) (part of Solway Group)

没有回应

TotalEnergies (formerly Total) 浏览回应
中国海洋石油集团有限公司

没有回应

Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation

没有回应

乌干达国家石油公司

没有回应

Phillips 66

没有回应

Marathon Petroleum

没有回应

Energy Transfer Partners 浏览回应
Enbridge 浏览回应
Indorama

没有回应

International Finance Corporation 浏览回应
Asian Development Bank (ADB) 浏览回应
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) 浏览回应

时间线