abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

27 一月 2025

作者:
ByMoriah Costa, Green Central Banking (UK)

EU: Banks should measure ESG risks and develop "transition plans" aligned with regulatory requirements, says European Banking Authority

“Bank transition plans should be compatible with other EU climate rules, EBA says”

EU banks will need to measure their ESG risks and develop transition plans that are aligned with the bloc’s climate targets and rules, the European Banking Authority (EBA) has said.

“ESG risks, in particular environmental risks through transition and physical risk drivers, pose challenges to the safety and soundness of institutions and may affect all traditional categories of financial risks to which they are exposed,” the EBA’s new guidelines state [BHRRC: If you face trouble accessing this EBA link from your PC, try via your phone, there seems to be a technical issue; PDF of the guidelines also available here].

The regulator has laid out how banks should identify and measure risks at an individual, portfolio and industry level. Special consideration should be given to exposure to the fossil fuel sector and institutions will need to collect data on how dependent banks are on fossil fuels.

Financial institutions should also have a plan to manage and mitigate risks over at least 10 years. These transition plans should be “a single, comprehensive strategic planning process that covers all regulatory requirements stemming from applicable legislation” such as the corporate sustainability reporting directive and corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD)…

“I think what the EBA has done comes at the right time, because they indeed highlight that this is not a question of duplicating the work… or creating other requirements compared to [the] CSDDD. It’s a single plan,” [Vincent Vandeloise, a senior researcher and advocacy officer at Finance Watch] said...

Meanwhile, the European Commission plans to release an omnibus package on 26 February to potentially cut back on sustainability reporting requirements, after EU elections swung the European parliament to the right and increased pressure to boost Europe’s economy. Numerous companies have spoken out against the omnibus package, arguing it would weaken the climate rules...

属于以下案件的一部分

EU: Development & implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Transposition & 'Omnibus' Updates

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。