abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2025年7月10日

作者:
NOVA BHRE,
作者:
Claire Bright, Daniel Schönfelder & Kristel Tonstad

EU: Omnibus proposal of 'tier 1' focus in CSDDD ignores experience from German & Norwegian laws, experts argue

Podcast 'Perspectives on the Omnibus Proposal': The experiences of Germany and Norway on mHREDD legislation

Key Lessons from the German Supply Chain Act (LkSG):

Positive impacts:

  • Clear obligations helped companies implement meaningful human rights due diligence (HRDD).
  • Companies hired HR experts and set up implementation teams.
  • The law enabled exploited workers (e.g., truck drivers) to claim stolen wages and other remedies...

Challenges:

  • Over-focus on Tier 1 suppliers created inefficiencies; real human rights risks often lie deeper in the supply chain.
  • Bureaucratic, checkbox-style compliance...
  • Legal uncertainty around civil liability created confusion...

Insights from the Norwegian Transparency Act:

Positive outcomes:

  • Demonstrated that regulating risk-based HRDD... is feasible.
  • Covers ~9,000 companies, including SMEs, who largely reported the law as “clear and manageable.”
  • Encouraged deeper supply chain engagement, responsible recruitment, living wages...

Challenges:

  • Some legal terms remain unclear, requiring better guidance...
  • Remediation is still poorly understood and implemented.

📘 Lessons Learned for the CSDDD:

  • The original 2024 CSDDD draft incorporated many positive elements:
    • Clear climate obligations.
    • Civil liability provisions.
    • Tier-n, risk-based approach (inspired by Norway).
    • Authority-led, evidence-based enforcement (inspired by Germany).
    • Provisions for supporting SMEs.
  • However, the Omnibus proposal risks:
    • Reversing progress by replacing simplification with deregulation.
    • Creating confusion with new terms that diverge from international standards.
    • Weakening core obligations...

🛠️ Policy Recommendations from Speakers:

  • Daniel Schönfelder:
    • Avoid tier-1-only focus; promote risk-based due diligence across the chain.
    • Don’t dilute the directive to respond to lobbying—focus on evidence-based regulation...
  • Kristel Tonstad:
    • Avoid introducing unnecessary new terminology...
    • Keep rights-holders central and support global consistency.

时间线