abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

故事

26 十月 2020

USA: Report alleges biggest law firms are contributing to climate change through defense of fossil fuel interests

A new report by Law Students for Climate Accountability is calling out big law firms for their role in the climate crisis. The Law Firm Climate Change Scorecard analyzes litigation, transactional, and lobbying work conducted by the 2020 Vault Law 100 law firms - a US-based ranking of the most prestigious law firms - for the benefit of fossil fuel clients. The report argues that law firms are not neutral actors, and that Vault 100 firms have no shortage of clients to chose from, yet too many have chosen the side of actors' responsible for the climate change crisis.

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited all law firms who received a failing score according to the report's methodology to respond. Their responses or non-responses are included below.

企业回应

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP

没有回应

Shearman & Sterling

没有回应

Sidley Austin

没有回应

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett

没有回应

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

没有回应

Squire Patton Boggs

没有回应

Sullivan & Cromwell

没有回应

Vinson & Elkins LLP

没有回应

White & Case

没有回应

King & Spalding

没有回应

Hogan Lovells

没有回应

Kirkland & Ellis

没有回应

Latham & Watkins

没有回应

McGuire Woods

没有回应

Milbank

没有回应

Munger, Tolles & Olson

没有回应

Linklaters 浏览回应
Clifford Chance 浏览回应
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

没有回应

Allen & Overy 浏览回应
Baker & Hostetler LLP

没有回应

Baker Botts LLP

没有回应

Baker McKenzie 浏览回应
Cravath Swaine & Moore

没有回应

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

没有回应

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 浏览回应

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。