abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2013年2月15日

作者:
US District Court for the District of Columbia

Arias v. DynCorp - Memorandum opinion

查看所有標籤
Plaintiffs, approximately 2,000 Ecuadorian citizens and domiciliaries bring common law negligence and other tort claims against the DynCorp defendants, alleging acute and chronic personal injuries caused by the defendants spraying herbicides over the plaintiffs’ lands in Ecuador. The defendants have filed a motion under federal Rule of Evidence 702 to exclude the testimony of the plaintiffs’ proffered expert witness, Dr. Michael A. Wolfson…The defendants’motion to exclude Dr. Wolfson’s expert testimonywill be granted in part and denied in part…

時間線