abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2010年4月28日

作者:
Rob Hanlon and Stephen Frost, CSR Asia

Google Theatre: The Sequel

查看所有標籤
Google should be commended for engaging in a debate and demonstrating how the private sector can incorporate human rights language into its business model…However, we are still not convinced the business case for human rights has benefited from Google’s withdrawal from China...Foreign firms continuously neglect the significance of realities facing business in China including…weak rule of law…Google would have done more for the human rights movement…if they had stated, “We are leaving because we cannot depend on the courts or police to protect our product”. Such a statement would have a profound effect on the psychology of industry that continues to believe it can operate sustainably in economies with weak legal systems...Only when MNCs begin to publicly and regularly acknowledge the impact of dysfunctional law on profit, will the business case for human rights become crystal clear.

時間線