abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2021年7月29日

作者:
Terence Creamer; Mining Weekly (South Africa)

S. Africa: An effective just transition should give vulnerable communities and workers agency in decision-making and ownership in production capacity; report

‘Report calls for freeze on new coal, warns of risks if energy transition is delayed’ 23 July 2021

South Africa should freeze investment in new private coal plants, as delaying South Africa’s “inevitable” transition away from the carbon-emitting energy mineral will cause economic damage, a new Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies (TIPS) analysis on the country’s coal value chain states. Co-authored by TIPS economists Neva Makgetla and Muhammed Patel, the report argues that the coal sector is mired in a classic process of creative destruction, whereby disruptive technologies have developed to a point where older assets can no longer compete and ultimately have to be written off. South Africa’s Integrated Resource Plan of 2019 (IRP 2019) includes an allocation for 1 500 MW of new private coal. This, despite indications that such projects would add to domestic electricity costs and the fact that two previous coal projects selected as preferred bids in a since stalled government procurement programme, Khanyisa and Thabametsi, have largely lost their initial foreign and domestic funding support.

…“Hard policy choices” were thus required to limit the damage, including freezing investment in new private coal plants, such as those catered for in the IRP 2019, and a mooted 3 500 MW coal plant proposed for the Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone, in Limpopo. Proceeding with such projects, the analysis argues, will make it virtually impossible to achieve national carbon emission reduction commitments and would only add to the ultimate costs, without securing sustainable benefits.

The other immediate actions proposed in the TIPS report include:

  • lifting unnecessary regulatory limits on investment in renewable and storage capacity, including restrictions on Eskom investment in cleaner energy sources;
  • encouraging the aluminium and ferroalloy refineries and Sasol to safeguard their longer-term export prospects by developing cleaner energy sources and introducing electricity-saving processes as rapidly as possible;
  • reviewing the timeline for closing down coal plants, given an Eskom proposal to shut down some of its power stations to open space for other energy sources.

Makgetla and Patel also urge more coordinated oversight in order to ensure that policies and structures are put in place to manage the risks and costs of the transition, which will take decades to unfold, and to maximise the benefits…Secondly, a just transition process should use industrial and labour-market policy instruments to assist the people and businesses concerned to take advantage of the identified opportunities. “Finally, effective just transitions should give vulnerable communities and workers agency, including through a voice in decision-making and ownership in new production capacity,” the authors assert