abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

هذه الصفحة غير متوفرة باللغة العربية وهي معروضة باللغة English

المحتوى متاح أيضًا باللغات التالية: English, 한국어

المقال

28 فبراير 2025

الكاتب:
Korea Bizwire

S. Korea: Hyundai Engineering & subcontractor found liable for safety breaches resulting in severe injury for Chinese-Korean worker

"Migrant worker wins lawsuit against construction firms over workplace injury,"

A Chinese-Korean construction worker who suffered a severe brain injury and paralysis after being struck by a falling pipe at a building site has won a lawsuit against the subcontractor and general contractor responsible for the project.

On February 27, the Incheon District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, a man in his 50s identified as A, awarding him approximately 940 million won in damages. The defendants, Hyundai Engineering and subcontractor B, were found liable for failing to implement adequate safety measures at the worksite...

A was injured on April 21, 2017, while assisting in lifting a pipe from the basement to the third floor of a new officetel construction site in Gangseo District, Seoul. The accident occurred when a lifting hook broke, causing the pipe to fall and strike him, resulting in brain damage and paralysis of his lower body.

Hyundai Engineering and subcontractor B argued that the accident was caused by A’s negligence and that the statute of limitations should apply, as the lawsuit was filed three years after the incident. The court rejected both claims, ruling that the primary cause of the accident was the companies’ failure to take proper precautions to prevent falling materials in hazardous areas.

...