abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Klage

Environmental Evaluation Service lawsuit (re Minera Los Pelambres copper mine, Chile)

Status: CLOSED

Date lawsuit was filed
30 Okt 2019
Nicht zutreffend
Gemeinschaft, Verteidiger der Menschenrechte, Individual
Ort der Einreichung: Chile
Ort des Vorfalls: Chile
Art des Rechtsstreits: Inländisch

Unternehmen

Grupo Luksic Chile Nahrung & Getränke, Bergbau, Diversifiziert/Konglomerate, Finanzwesen & Banking, Häfen, Transportwesen: Allgemein, Energie
Mitsubishi Group Japan Nahrung & Getränke, Chemikalien: Allgemein, Elektronische Geräte, Finanzwesen & Banking, Bergbau, Technologie: Elektronik, Internet- und Telekommunikationsanbieter, Transportwesen: Allgemein
Mitsubishi Materials (part of Mitsubishi Group) Japan Metalle/Kunststoffe/Grundstoffe: Allgemein
Marubeni Japan Wasserstoff, Nahrung & Getränke, Chemikalien: Allgemein, Transportwesen: Allgemein, Energie, Nuklearenergie

Against other:

Government

Quellen

Snapshot: In October 2019, a group of residents from the town Caimanes, in the Coquimbo region in northern Chile, filed a lawsuit with the First Environmental Court against the Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA) over the approval of a project to install additional infrastructure in the Los Pelambres copper mine, operated by Antofagasta Minerals (part of Luksic Group). They alleged that they were not consulted during the Environmental Impact Assessment. The residents claimed that the project adversely affected their quality of life, posing a continuous threat to their right to live in an uncontaminated environment. They sought the invalidation of the SEA's approval of the Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA) and challenged the rejection of their invalidation request. Additionally, they pointed out irregularities in the public participation process, asserting that the residents were not properly informed or given the opportunity to provide input on the project. In January 2020, the the Caimanes Defense Committee joined the proceedings. In October 2020, the Court rejected the claim, citing the project complied with its obligations to public participation. The claimants filed an appeal against this decision before the Supreme Court (Proceedings 132151-2020). In August 2021, the claimants withdrew their appeal after an agreement was reached between the parties. The case is closed.