abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English


5 Jun 2006

United States District Court - Central District of California

[PDF] Order denying Unocal’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding Lexington’s defense of concealment

[Defendants]: Lexington insurance company...Zurich Re...New Hampshire Insurance...Gerling-Konzern Allgemeine Versicherungs...Lexington has provided evidence showing that Unocal utilized the Myanmar military to provide security for the Yadana Pipeline project and that Unocal was aware that the military had committed human rights abuses prior to the project in proposed pipeline areas. Lexington has also provided evidence showing that Unocal disclosed only its business expansion into Myanmar and the Yadana Pipeline, not Unocal’s security relationship with the Myanmar military...

Part of the following timelines

Unocal lawsuit against its insurers over Burma abuses settlement: court denies Unocal's motion for summary judgement

Unocal lawsuit (re Myanmar)