abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

This page is not available in Deutsch and is being displayed in English


Rejoinder from MiningWatch to Equinox Gold response

..we feel that the questions raised in our press release remain unanswered. Would you be able to provide the following information?

  • ...In a report prepared under the National Policy for Dam Safety, with assistance from the Mining Dams Divisions and Safety Services, Lagoa do Pirocaua appears listed as a mining dam (barragen de mineração). If this is not a dam why does the Ministry call it a dam?
  • Clarification of why Equinox Gold didn’t register Lagoa de Pirocaua before March 25th, when it was operating; the National Mining Agency (ANM) lists it as registered on March 31st, 2021, as “desativada” (closed).
  • Clarification of why the Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Naturais (SEMA) of Maranhão is reporting two failures. On April 8th, SEMA published an article that says there was a failure in another structure above Lagoa do Pirocaua that caused the failure at Lagoa do Pirocaua. In an article published on April 9, the government of Maranhão echoes this information.
  • Proof that the small freshwater lagoon is not an old garimpo lagoon, historically used for artisanal mining...

Story Timeline