abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapelocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewprofilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathtagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponsible en español y se muestra enEnglish

Artículo

Supping with a long spoon - How much do human rights count for, when there’s business to be done?

The real live debate is twofold. Is there sufficient reason – and pressure – for companies to [bear responsibility for their human rights impacts] voluntarily? And in what circumstances are they just kidding themselves (or the public) that constructive engagement can work, when there’s really only one ethical answer to the question ‘should I stay or should I go?’ [refers to Shell, BP, Premier Oil, Texaco (part of ChevronTexaco), Levi Strauss, BAT (British American Tobacco)]

Story Timeline