abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

This page is not available in Italiano and is being displayed in English

Story

DRC : A Policy Brief lists the companies poised to benefit from the DRC Peace Deal ; with co. responses and non-responses

The peace agreement signed in June 2025 between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) under the auspices of the Trump administration raises serious concerns about whom it truly serves. Rather than securing lasting peace for the Congolese people, the deal appears poised to benefit corporate and financial interests eager to access the country’s vast mineral wealth. Investigating these interests, a Policy Brief alerts that the US firms and oligarchs set to profit from the deal lack the interest, history, and know-how to make peace happen and last. Barring a radical shift, this deal may only perpetuate the deadly cycle of exploitation that has plagued the country for centuries.

The Business and Human Rights Centre invited relevant companies mentioned in the Policy Brief to respond to the concerns raised by Congolese civil society organisations. More specifically, we reached out to companies to inquire about the human rights due diligence measures they will take to ensure that their operations do not exacerbate the ongoing conflict.

KoBold Metals, Glencore and Ivanhoe Mines responded.

Rio Tinto, America First Global, Orion Resource Partners, Tesla and Alphamin Resources did not respond.

Company Responses

Glencore View Response
KoBold Metals View Response
Rio Tinto

No Response

America First Global

No Response

Orion Resource Partners

No Response

Tesla

No Response

Alphamin Resources

No Response

Ivanhoe Mines View Response

Sequenza temporale