abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

12 11月 2019

著者:
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

Commentary: Proposed SEC rules to restrict proxy access would weaken corporate accountability structures

"Proposed SEC rules to restrict proxy access break faith with investors," 5 Nov 2019

[A] 3-2, party-line vote [on 5 November 2019] by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding proposed changes to its shareholder proposal rule... prompted a fierce rebuke from the investment community...The SEC is proposing to revise the [existing] rule so that shareholders must own [their] stake for a minimum of three years before they can submit a resolution. If they are shareowners for under three years, they must own up to a $25,000 stake in the company in order to file a resolution... [N]ew re-filing thresholds... would more than double [exisiting] thresholds to 5%, 15% and 25% respectively... the rule changes would significantly weaken corporate accountability structures. Raising the ownership threshold threatens to exclude smaller investors.

... “We see this unjustified action by the SEC as part of a broader move across this Administration to realign the regulatory landscape in favor of corporate interests at the expense of the public interest,” [said Josh Zinner, CEO of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility]... Timothy Smith, Director of Shareowner Engagement at Boston Trust Walden [said]... "restricting investors’ use of the shareholder resolution process will only encourage the use of... legal action and withholds on directors and say on pay votes to gain the attention of companies on key governance and environmental issues.”...These provisions would tilt the scales... in favor of corporate management, and have... long been advocated by pro-business trade groups like the Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。