abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2013年2月15日

著者:
US District Court for the District of Columbia

Arias v. DynCorp - Memorandum opinion

全てのタグを見る
Plaintiffs, approximately 2,000 Ecuadorian citizens and domiciliaries bring common law negligence and other tort claims against the DynCorp defendants, alleging acute and chronic personal injuries caused by the defendants spraying herbicides over the plaintiffs’ lands in Ecuador. The defendants have filed a motion under federal Rule of Evidence 702 to exclude the testimony of the plaintiffs’ proffered expert witness, Dr. Michael A. Wolfson…The defendants’motion to exclude Dr. Wolfson’s expert testimonywill be granted in part and denied in part…

タイムライン