abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

ストーリー

Companies respond to "Defending rights and realising just economies: Human rights defenders and business 2015-2024"

Over the past decade, human rights defenders (HRDs) have courageously organised to stop corporate abuse and prevent business activities from causing harm – exposing human rights and environmental violations, demanding accountability, and advocating for rights-respecting economic practices.

From January 2015 to December 2024, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre (the Resource Centre) recorded more than 6,400 attacks across 147 countries against people who voiced concerns about business-related risks or harms. This is close to two attacks on average every day over the past ten years. In 2024 alone, we tracked 660 attacks.

Additional key findings include:

  • Attacks against HRDs occurred in relation to almost every business sector in every region of the world.
  • Mining, agribusiness and fossil fuels were the sectors connected with the highest number of attacks.
  • Nearly three quarters of attacks targeted climate, land and environmental defenders. This includes a severe crackdown on the right to protest by governments across the globe.
  • One in five attacks were on Indigenous Peoples, despite comprising only 6% of the world’s population.
  • Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia and the Pacific have consistently been the most dangerous regions for HRDs raising concerns about corporate harm, accounting for close to three in four total attacks recorded.
  • There have been more than 530 instances of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) brought or initiated by private actors against HRDs raising concerns about business since 2015.
  • The highest numbers of attacks occurred when people raised concerns about social and enviornmental risks or harms associated with large business projects, and governments and/or companies attempted to suppress dissent. The projects associated with the highest number of attacks over the past decade have been the Lake Albert oil extraction and development project (which includes the East African Crude Oil Pipeline) (Uganda and Tanzania), Inversiones los Pinares (Honduras), Dakota Access Pipeline (USA), Las Bambas mine (Peru), and Line 3 Pipeline (USA and Canada).
  • Attacks on HRDs and restrictions on civic freedoms are bad for business. They prevent companies and investors from accessing crucial information about human rights risks and impacts, increasing operational, financial and reputational risk.

We invited Brasil BioFuels, the Interoceanic Corridor of the Tehuantepec Isthmus (CIIT), Inversiones los Pinares, Empresas Públicas de Medellín (EPM), Grupo EMCO Holding, TotalEnergies, TotalEnergies Uganda, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC), Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC), Minera Las Bambas, Minerals and Metals Group (MMG), China Minmetals, CITIC Metal, Guoxin International Investment, Energy Transfer, Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum, Enbridge, Lin Vatey, Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel (CGN), Solway Group, PT Makmur Elok Graha (MEG), Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd, Export-Import Bank of Korea, Ternium, Technit Group, Indorama Agro, IFC, EBRD, ADB and Citigroup to respond.

Brasil BioFuels, the Interoceanic Corridor of the Tehuantepec Isthmus (CIIT), TotalEnergies, TotalEnergies Uganda, Minera Las Bambas, Minerals and Metals Group (MMG), Energy Transfer, Enbridge, Solway Group, Ternium, IFC, EBRD, ADB and Citigroup responded; their responses are available below.

The other companies did not respond.

企業への回答リクエスト

Brasil BioFuels 回答を見る
Solway Group 回答を見る
PT Makmur Elok Graha

回答無し

Minera Las Bambas (JV between MMG (62.5%),Guoxin International Investment Co. Ltd (22.5%), and CITIC Metal Co. Ltd (15.0%)) 回答を見る
Corredor Interoceánico del Istmo de Tehuantepec (CIIT) 回答を見る
Techint Group

回答無し

Ternium (part of Techint Group) 回答を見る
Citigroup 回答を見る
EPM (Empresas Públicas de Medellín)

回答無し

Lin Vatey

回答無し

Daewoo E&C

回答無し

Export-Import Bank of Korea

回答無し

Inversiones Los Pinares S.A. (part of Grupo EMCO Holding)

回答無し

Grupo EMCO Holding

回答無し

China Minmetals

回答無し

CITIC Metal

回答無し

CNIC Corporation Limited (former Guoxin International Investment)

回答無し

Compañía Guatemalteca de Níquel (CGN) (part of Solway Group)

回答無し

TotalEnergies (formerly Total) 回答を見る
CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation)

回答無し

Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation

回答無し

Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC)

回答無し

Phillips 66

回答無し

Marathon Petroleum

回答無し

Energy Transfer Partners 回答を見る
Enbridge 回答を見る
Indorama

回答無し

International Finance Corporation 回答を見る
Asian Development Bank (ADB) 回答を見る
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) 回答を見る

タイムライン