abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2006年10月1日

著者:
Stephanie Barrientos & Sally Smith, Institute of Development Studies (Univ. of Sussex, UK), commissioned by Ethical Trading Initiative

[PDF] "Report on the ETI Impact Assessment 2006: Summary - The ETI code of labour practice: Do workers really benefit?"

Across most supply sites in the case studies, we found improvements in the following areas of the ETI Base Code: • health and safety, for example better fire safety, introduction of training on emergency procedures, and safer use of chemicals; • working hours - reduced regular and overtime hours; • wages, for example ensuring payment of the minimum wage and provision of state insurance and pensions; • child labour - less employment of children and young workers. Codes had had most impact on health and safety, with other areas of change varying considerably between countries and sectors. We observed less impact in relation to freedom of association, discrimination, regular employment and harsh treatment, where serious issues frequently remained.