abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

NGOの反論

7 3月 2017

著者:
Charles Hector, Syed Shahir bin Syed Mohamud, Mohd Roszeli bin Majid, Pranom Somwong via Good Electronics with the support of 54 organisations, trade unions and groups

Rejoinder by Charles Hector, Syed Shahir bin Syed Mohamud, Mohd Roszeli bin Majid, Pranom Somwong via Good Electronics with the support of 54 organisations, trade unions and groups

...The matter has not yet referred to the courts at this time. What is upcoming are attempts at conciliation. It is our hope that this matter can be speedily resolved, and justice will prevail. Even, if and when the matter reaches the courts, there is always the possibility to resolve this matter without waiting for the end of the court processes, which in Malaysia takes a very long time. Justice delayed is justice denied. 2 -  After further investigations of the available evidence(including documentary evidence), we believe that your action in dismissing the said Union leader maybe by reason of you not having the benefit of all the available facts of the case, and the applicable law. 3 – Briefly, we want to highlight the following few points:- a)      Charged with a misconduct, i.e. “act of malingering” – which is not even in the list of INFINEON’s list of misconducts that covers both expressed and implied breaches of contract. b)      The main element that need to shown to justify an act of malingering is that the employee had feigned illness for the purposes of avoiding work. This was not even clear in the charge. Attending a union activity whilst on sick leave only raises grounds for suspicion that there may be an ‘act of malingering’ – it certainly is not proof that the misconduct was committed....

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。