“Apple, Google, and Meta Ordered to Face Lawsuits Over Casino-Style Gambling Apps”, 1 October 2025

Tech giants Apple, Google, and Meta Platforms must defend themselves in federal court against lawsuits accusing them of facilitating illegal gambling through casino-style mobile applications. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, allows the bulk of the consumer protection and racketeering claims to move forward, despite efforts by the companies to have the case dismissed.

The lawsuits allege that the companies did far more than simply provide a platform for these gambling-style apps. Instead, they are accused of actively profiting from user addiction by processing payments, collecting commissions, and promoting apps designed to mimic slot machines and casinos......

According to the lawsuits, many players developed serious addictions, reporting emotional distress, financial hardship, depression, and even suicidal ideation. The plaintiffs contend that the companies were aware of these dangers yet continued to profit by collecting up to 30% in commissions on in-app purchases...

Apple, Google, and Meta each argued that they were shielded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act… Judge Davila, however, ruled that this defense does not fully apply when companies take on the role of financial intermediaries.... This interpretation of Section 230 is significant, as it narrows the scope of immunity tech platforms have relied on for decades.... Judge Davila granted permission for an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals....

The decision puts Big Tech on notice: when platforms cross from hosting content into profiting directly from controversial or harmful activities, courts may no longer accept Section 230 as a shield. This case will not only shape the future of gambling apps but could influence the broader debate over platform responsibility in the digital age.