abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página não está disponível em Português e está sendo exibida em English

Artigo

16 Jan 2013

Author:
compiled by Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Public Eye Awards 2013

For the annual "Public Eye Awards", which the organisers (Greenpeace Switzerland & Berne Declaration) say are for the "worst cases of corporate human rights abuses and environmental misdeeds", seven companies were nominated in January 2013. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the companies to respond to this press release detailing the reasons for their nominations...[We received responses from Alstom, G4S, Lonmin. Shell declined to respond. Coal India, Goldman Sachs & Repower did not respond. Also includes rejoinder to G4S's response by John Grayson & Adri Neiuwhof in openDemocracy. We invited G4S to respond and it referred us to its earlier response] On 24 January 2013 it was announced that Shell had "won" the Public Eye Award 2012, and that a separate award had also been conferred on Goldman Sachs, by a jury.

Linha do tempo