…The first [case] is about…the dismantling of…ships in…India, an example of how the North dumps toxic waste in the South. The second is about a[n]…attempt to build a hazardous waste incinerator in…Bulgaria…[A] valuation conflict emerges…on whether the projects are desirable due to positive impacts like economic development and employment generation, or disruptive for the environment and society…In the Bulgarian case European institutions, under civil society pressure…decided to withdraw funding the project did not take place…[A]t the Supreme Court of India the local communities and the activists emphasized the injustice of an unequal distribution of costs and benefits and the disproportionate environmental and social damages at the local scale…[but] the Supreme Court decided [against them]…[and its] decision is based on…the idea that economic benefits can compensate for environmental degradation…[refers to Norwegian Cruise Line, Star Cruise Ltd., Bridgeed Shipping, Hariyana Steel Demolition Pvt. Ltd., Priya Blue Industries Pvt. Ltd., Chemcontrol a/s & Fichtner]