abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Статья

17 Июн 2019

Автор:
Sipho Kings, Mail & Guardian (South Africa)

So. Africa: ArcelorMittal criminally charged for environmental pollution; company comments

‘ArcelorMittal charged with breaking environment laws’ 7 June 2019

One of South Africa’s largest industrial air polluters, ArcelorMittal, has been charged with breaking environmental laws. Although the company runs several enormous iron smelters around the world, the charges are for pollution at its Vanderbijlpark plant, south of Johannesburg. That plant, a relic of an apartheid state intent on surviving sanctions by producing resources such as iron, has had a long-running battle with the environmental affairs department and civil society groups. The charge sheet has two accused: ArcelorMittal South Africa and its environmental manager. It says the accused are “guilty of the following offences” and lists three separate occasions where air quality laws were broken. Those laws are realised by section 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees that “everyone has the right to have an environment that is not harmful to their health or wellbeing”

…In a press release announcing the charges to shareholders, the company said: “The summons instituting criminal proceedings in this regard were served on the company on May 30 2019.” The maximum fine for this is R15-million, according to the announcement. ArcelorMittal said it had talked to its lawyers and would “adhere to the relevant legal processes that will follow”. These charges are not the first time the company has fallen foul of the law. In a 2007 inspection, the environment department’s Green Scorpions noted the plant was releasing “excessive emissions of sulphur dioxide” each day. Earlier this year, the company said it was unable to stop pollutants coming from its sprawling steel plant and asked for more time to upgrade parts of it so as to comply with the law. This permission would allow it to keep emitting high levels of pollutants.

The Mail &Guardian has reported on the company’s Vanderbijlpark plant on several occasions in the past two decades. On each occasion, people talked about late-night pollution from the factory and how sick it made them. Some said they had to buy medication, such as asthma inhalers. Others said their livestock had been affected by polluted air and water in the area…Like others, she laid the blame squarely at the feet of ArcelorMittal: “We suffer because of that factory. It does what it wants and nobody is fighting for us.” In March, the M&G visited the area again. One resident said that on some nights, when air pollution is particularly bad, he wakes up with blood flowing out of his nose. “That’s when I take my children to the [Vaal] river to breathe.”