abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2021年5月27日

作者:
David Adams, Business Insider Australia

Australian students claim 'global first' legal victory after Federal Court finds the government has a duty of care over climate change impacts

查看所有标签

27 May 2021

A group of Australian children has claimed an unprecedented legal victory over the Federal Government, after the Federal Court found Environment Minister Sussan Ley has a duty of care to future generations when considering projects which may accelerate climate change.

[...]

In a ruling handed down Thursday, Justice Mordecai Bromberg did not contest expert evidence that a “4℃ Future World” scenario, in which temperatures rise four degrees Celcius above pre-industrial levels, could have catastrophic consequences for future generations.

And Bromberg acknowledged the children’s argument that they are subject to a duty of care in relation to the potential risks of climate change — with some of that responsibility resting on the Environment Minister.

“In the context of there being a real risk that even an infinitesimal increase in global average surface temperature may trigger a 4℃ Future World, the Minister’s prospective contribution is not so insignificant as to deny a real risk of harm to the Children,” Bromberg said.

[...]

However, Bromberg did not grant the injunction, saying that since the children were not at imminent risk of harm, “it is highly undesirable to pre-empt the Minister’s decision” on the expansion.

[...]

In a statement provided to the ABC, Whitehaven appreciated Bromberg’s decision not to grant the injunction, saying the application has “no merit”.

时间线