abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

企业回应

2010年7月12日

作者:
Gold Fields

Gold Fields' response

Gold Fields Ghana (GFG) is not cited in the DanWatch report as one of the mining companies in the country engaged in “aggressive tax planning”. By implication though, the report suggests that other companies are engaged in similar practices. For the record we have listed a number of our contributions to the Ghanaian economy since 1993, when the company acquired the almost defunct State Gold Mining Corporation’s underground mine at Tarkwa.

属于以下案件的一部分

Ghana: Report says deployment of military to mining areas has led to serious human rights violations

Report highlights negative social impact of tax avoidance by mining companies in Africa