abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2015年3月16日

作者:
Chloe Christman, Oxfam America

Oxfam commentary: "Is Coca-Cola getting serious about its zero tolerance for global land grabs?"

查看所有标签

Oxfam and others will be conducting in-depth analyses of Coca-Cola’s impact assessments in the coming months. But a quick look reveals that they do not tell the full story of sugar in Guatemala and Colombia – the story that Oxfam has come to understand through our partners on the ground. Coca-Cola’s sugar sourcing affects communities and poses risks to their land rights in ways that the company has yet to identify.Still, Oxfam welcomes Coca-Cola’s willingness to begin ‘walking the walk’ on land rights. It’s not an easy path, and we want to encourage the company to stick with it and make course corrections when needed...Oxfam is encouraged that Coca-Cola views these first assessments as “living documents” which will “evolve” as the company “[receives] further stakeholder comments on the improvements in the human rights due diligence process and on the substance of these due diligence reports.”

时间线