abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

6 五月 2025

作者:
By Amandine Van Den Berghe, Sustainable Views

EU: Ambiguous language on climate transition plans in Omnibus proposal must be removed to reduce legal uncertainty & increase clarity on implementation - op-ed

“Corporate transition plans should not be optional”

…The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is a crucial piece of legislation designed to hold companies accountable for preventing and addressing environmental damage and human rights violations throughout their value chains. Notably, it aims to ensure big companies not only talk about climate transition plans but implement them.

However, the recent omnibus proposal from the European Commission risks diluting this intent, potentially doubling down on the risk of talking without doing…

The omnibus proposal introduces language that, if adopted, would blur the lines between planning and execution.

Article 22 of the CSDDD mandates that companies adopt and action transition plans for climate change mitigation; however, the proposed new wording lacks clarity on the extent to which implementation is required…

…The vagueness the omnibus introduces to the CSDDD opens the door to varied interpretations by countries and companies. This creates an uneven playing field and increases legal uncertainty…

…the absence of concrete climate transition plan requirements does not shield companies from legal repercussions.

The landmark case against Shell in the Netherlands, for instance, underscored that companies can be held accountable when they fail to adequately incorporate climate change considerations into their policy and governance frameworks…

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。