abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

非政府組織回答

18 三月 2024

作者:
Migrant Justice

Migrant Justice's rejoinder to response from Ahold Delhaize and Hannaford

.....Hannaford has resisted calls from farmers and farmworkers to join the Milk with Dignity Program since 2019, despite well-documented labor abuses and severe human rights violations on the farms producing Hannaford-brand milk. Migrant Justice’s campaign has received support from national faith organizations, labor and climate groups, agricultural organizations, legislators, and thousands of Hannaford customers who have sent emails, written postcards, made calls, and attended rallies.

[....]

Migrant Justice has documented cases of physical abuse, substandard housing, discrimination, rampant health and safety violations, and retaliation on farms that sell to Hannaford's suppliers.

Without adequate training or protection from retaliation, Hannaford’s standards of engagement offer these workers no meaningful protections.

Further, in the case of one worker, the retaliation he faced for speaking up was damaging enough that not only did he leave the area, but such events have had a chilling effect on other workers who might consider raising concerns. In such an atmosphere, an absence of complaints should not be considered as evidence that all is well.

[...]

While both of these industry groups [National Milk Producers Federation and the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy] may do good work in their area of expertise, neither has an explicit focus on protecting the human rights of workers ...

[...]

The FARM self-assessments are likely a useful tool for farmers. But they are by no means structured to prioritize human rights. FARM standards are a collection of suggestions for best practices for creating an HR manual and becoming “an employer of choice” – this is not about workers’ rights or protections.

[...]

So far in Migrant Justice’s conversations with workers on northeast dairy farms, the only consequence of Hannaford’s engagement has been the posting of “Restricted Access” signs, which workers viewed as retaliatory and an attempt to bar advocates from visiting them in on-farm housing – not resolving or providing remedy to any of the issues raised.

As key rights-holders, workers should be engaged in the process of assessments. Instead, workers report being unaware of any such assessment and have not been consulted, even in cases where they have reported violations via Hannafords’ Speak Up line.

[...]

Full response attached below

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。