abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

11 二月 2025

作者:
Sarah Kent, The Business of Fashion

Why Can’t Fashion Eliminate Labour Exploitation From Its Supply Chains?

...

In Taiwan, industry watchdogs say the issue is pervasive — the result of limited regulatory protections and a heavy reliance on migrant labour, especially for low-paying industrial jobs like textile manufacturing.

“The placement fee in Taiwan is notorious,” said Jing Ru Wu, a researcher at the Taiwan International Workers’ Association, a Taiwanese NGO focused on migrant workers’ rights.

Transparentem’s report found migrant workers at textile mills in the country had paid labour brokers as much as $6,000 to secure work — among the highest recruitment fees the nonprofit has uncovered over the course of multiple investigations in several countries. The investigation covered nine suppliers with links to nearly 50 global brands, including major sportswear companies with commitments to end the practice.

Some workers reported paying additional deposits of between $500 and $1,000, down payments interviewees described as a means of preventing their “escape.” The payments didn’t stop after landing a contract, either. Workers said they were required to pay agents monthly service fees of $50 to $60, the equivalent of two full month’s wages over the course of a three-year contract. At some factories, workers said their movements were restricted and their passports taken away. Complaints about poor labour conditions or efforts to organise were met with threats of repatriation, they said.

There were also signs that the years of work by Patagonia and others had made a real difference. Most of the suppliers linked to Patagonia, Nike, Lululemon, Adidas and Puma had introduced “no fee” policies since 2020, seeming to largely end the practice for new hires, the investigation found.

But there still appear to be gaps in the system. Older employees at these factories said they had not been reimbursed for past expenses. Workers at one factory with links to all five brands said they still faced recruitment fees even after a commitment to end them was introduced. The sportswear giants also all still had connections to suppliers with no policies on recruitment fees in place at all.

...

[Subscription required.]

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。