abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

20 二月 2025

作者:
Jennifer Krill, Earthworks,
作者:
Jim Wormington, Human Rights Watch

Increased support for transition minerals mining raises the need for stronger standards and regulation to protect communities and the environment

"Global Demand for Minerals Requires New Mining Protections | Opinion", 20 February 2025

"The world is likely to see a spate of new mining projects in 2025. New U.S. President Donald Trump, while promising the dangerous expansion of U.S. oil and gas production, aims to make the U.S. "the leading producer and processor" of minerals. Several mining companies whose copper, nickel, and other projects were denied or are awaiting approval are hoping for a green light to break ground under the new administration.

Outside of the U.S., the urgent need to transition to renewable energy is driving increased government support for mining worldwide. Governments are keen to secure the lithium, cobalt, and other minerals needed for electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, and other renewable energy technologies.

The acceleration and expansion of mining poses risks for Indigenous Peoples, communities, and the environment. The mining industry has a track record of human rights abuses and other harm, from the destruction of sacred Indigenous lands to deaths from devastating waste storage dam collapses. In October 2024, a United Nations panel warned that increasing global demand for minerals, "If not managed responsibly, could trigger or exacerbate human rights violations and abuses, conflicts, violence, and harm to affected communities and individuals along the value chain."

Our organizations are pushing for strong government regulation of mining to protect communities and the environment. Key priorities in the U.S. include reforming an antiquated 1872 mining law and expanding government and company consultation with communities prior to approving mining projects, including protecting Indigenous Peoples' right to free, prior, and informed consent.

In the European Union (EU), there has already been some tangible progress. European institutions have adopted a corporate accountability law requiring all companies, mining and otherwise, to address human rights and environmental abuses in their operations and supply chains. Another EU law requires companies making or importing batteries to ensure the lithium, nickel, graphite, and cobalt in the batteries are sourced responsibly.

The EU is also trying to secure its own access to what it calls "critical raw materials" and has passed legislation to streamline permitting procedures for "strategic" mining projects. Civil society groups in the EU underscore that mine permitting processes should include the participation of affected communities and environmental groups and ensure they have enough time to raise concerns and objections.

Although no substitute for strong government regulation, there are also voluntary standards that can provide guidance to mining companies on best practices...

Some mining companies, however, are yet to embrace IRMA's voluntary standard and are looking for a less demanding alternative. The International Council on Mining and Metals, a business association of the world's biggest mining companies, is working with other mining industry groups to develop their own mining standard, called the "Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative."

We and dozens of other civil society groups have warned the council and its partners that standards developed by the mining industry without meaningful participation from affected communities, workers, and civil society groups will lack transparency, accountability, and rigor.

Analysis of the new mining industry standard by Public Citizen, Earthworks, and other groups found that its requirements were too vague to provide detailed guidance on responsible mining. The standard also enables mining companies to claim "foundational level" performance for practices that fall well short of international standards.

Communities and Indigenous Peoples—and mining companies, their investors, and customers—will not be well served by an industry-led standard that risks glossing over human rights and environmental harm and that does not provide transparent and detailed analysis of mining companies' performance.

Greater demand for mining in 2025 means a greater need to effectively regulate mining and hold companies accountable for human rights and environmental harm. Robust and detailed voluntary standards, like IRMA, could help support responsible mining, but only if they meaningfully promote mining companies' respect for human rights and the environment.

Jennifer Krill is executive director of Earthworks.

Jim Wormington is a senior researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch."

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。