abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

26 二月 2025

作者:
dv. Apar Gupta, Gayatri Malhotra, Naman Kumar, Injila Muslim Zaidi and Shravani Nag Lanka, Internet Freedom Foundation

India: Internet Freedom Foundation submits report to UN on digital censorship, alleged suppression of free speech

" IFF’s submission to the UN Report on “Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age”, 26 February 2025

IFF made submissions to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression thematic report on “Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age”. Our submission outlines the challenges and threats to freedom of speech and expression during electoral processes in India with a focus on the role played by digital platforms.

...

Internet censorship actions ranging from internet shutdowns to individual website/account blocking have been enforced in India. Instances include the internet blackouts imposed in the 2024 farmers' protest

...

These orders undermine public access to information, disrupt political organizing, and weaken democratic participation. Additionally, evidence has shown how such shutdowns can escalate unrest instead of curbing it by driving up instances of violent and uncoordinated actions. This is aggravated by the limitations in accessing fact-checking tools, adding fuel to the fire.

...

Platforms such as Hindutva Watch and India Hate Lab that document crimes against marginalized communities were blocked by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology “(MeitY”) in 2024 without following due process.

...

X admitted to removing posts and accounts under government directives while noting “disagreement” due to the risk of penalties, including imprisonment. Such impositions force compliance and deter free speech and expression.

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。