abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

故事

Saudi Arabia: Companies respond to Business & Human Rights Resource Centre's new report on exploitation of Nepali & Bangladeshi workers on renewables projects

In October 2025, the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (the Resource Centre) launched its new report, '“We were treated as if we were machines”: Migrant workers powering Saudi Arabia’s energy transition', analysing working conditions for migrants employed on renewable energy projects Saudi Arabia.

Grounded in interviews with Nepali and Bangladeshi workers, the report found a litany of human rights violations across nine renewable energy projects in Saudi Arabia, with over half of interviewees experiencing five or more indicators of forced labour. The report also analysed the human rights commitments of companies with business connections to the projects, and the responsibilities of banks financing the projects. Read the full report here.

Forty-one companies were included in the report due to their business connections to five named projects. This includes:

  • Seven companies linked to abuse through supply chain connections: ACWA Power, the Public Investment Fund, Saudi Aramco, NEOM and Air Products are developers on at least one of the five projects. These companies selected construction and engineering contractors, Larsen & Toubro and/ or PowerChina, to construct elements of the renewables projects, which then employed migrant workers – either directly or through subcontractors – in abusive working conditions. Most interviewees were employed in the supply chain of Larsen & Toubro.
  • Nine companies working on the projects, but workers were not interviewed in their supply chains. These companies were included due to their presence on their project, and hence exposure to risk: Saudi Electricity Company and NEOM contracted Hitachi Energy and Saudi Services for Electro Mechanic Works to develop NEOM’s energy transmission system; SPG Steiner and local partners MAN Enterprise and Almajal Alarabi Group were contracted to construct ammonia storage tanks at NEOM; Thyssenkrupp and De Nora partnered in a joint venture to engineer and maintain NEOM’s water electrolysis modules; and Archirodon is building an ammonia jetty at NEOM
  • Twenty-five banks financing the projects named in the report: Standard Chartered, Riyad Bank and Mizuho Financial Group (financed all five projects); Banque Saudi Fransi, Saudi National Bank, HSBC and Saudi Awwal Bank (financed four projects); Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Arab Petroleum Investments, First Abu Dhabi Bank and Korea Development Bank (financed two projects); and Abu Dhabi Commerical Bank, Al Rajhi Bank, Alimna Bank, Bank Al Bilad, Bank Aljazira, BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, DZ Bank, Emirates NBD, JPMorgan Chase, KfW, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Natixis, and The Norinchukin Bank (financed one project).

Ahead of the report's launch, the Resource Centre invited these companies to respond to the report's findings. Additionally, the Resource Centre invited companies with supply chain connections to abuse and financiers to disclose any steps they will take to investigate the abuses and ensure timely remediation.

By the time of the report's publication, responses were received from 15 companies: BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, De Nora, DZ Bank, Hitachi Energy, HSBC, KfW, Larsen and Toubro, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Mizuho Financial Group, SPG Steiner, Standard Chartered, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, The Norinchukin Bank, and Thyssenkrupp. Their responses can be read in full below.

企業回應

De Nora 瀏覽回應
Hitachi (part of Hitachi Group) 瀏覽回應
Larsen & Toubro 瀏覽回應
SPG Steiner 瀏覽回應
Thyssenkrupp 瀏覽回應
BNP Paribas 瀏覽回應
Crédit Agricole 瀏覽回應
DZ BANK 瀏覽回應
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group 瀏覽回應
Mizuho Financial Group 瀏覽回應
Standard Chartered 瀏覽回應
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group 瀏覽回應
The Norinchukin Bank 瀏覽回應
ACWA Power

沒有回應

Air Products

沒有回應

Almajal Alarabi

沒有回應

Archirodon

沒有回應

MAN Enterprise

沒有回應

NEOM Co.

沒有回應

中國電建

沒有回應

Public Investment Fund

沒有回應

Saudi Aramco

沒有回應

Saudi Electricity Company

沒有回應

Saudi Services for Electro Mechanic Works (SSEM)

沒有回應

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank

沒有回應

Al Rajhi Bank

沒有回應

Alimna Bank

沒有回應

Arab Petroleum Investments (APICORP)

沒有回應

Bank Al Bilad

沒有回應

Bank Aljazira

沒有回應

Banque Saudi Fransi

沒有回應

Emirates NBD

沒有回應

First Abu Dhabi Bank

沒有回應

摩根大通

沒有回應

Korea Development Bank (KDB)

沒有回應

Natixis

沒有回應

Riyad Bank

沒有回應

Saudi Awwal Bank (SAB)

沒有回應

Saudi National Bank

沒有回應

時間線