abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

故事

12 四月 2025

Tracking corporate shifts and exits from climate commitments

In recent months, there has been a noticeable shift in the corporate backing for climate commitments. The Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), which once represented a important collective effort by global banks to align their operations with net-zero emissions by 2050, has experienced a significant pullback. Several major institutions, including Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup, and J.P. Morgan Chase, withdrawing from the alliance in late 2024 and early 2025. In April 2025, the NZBA decided to ditch its Paris-aligned 1.5 membership target. Political pressures, particularly in the U.S., have intensified as the Republican-led administration and state attorneys general have raised concerns about the potential legal and financial consequences of such climate pledges, including their impact on financing for the fossil fuel industry. This broader shift in policy priorities under the new U.S. administration further complicates the landscape, as companies face increasing scrutiny and opposition from both policymakers and investors.

At the same time, other corporate entities beyond the banking sector have reconsidered their climate strategies. ​In recent months, major energy companies including BP, Shell, and Equinor, have scaled back their energy transition ambitions, reducing investments in renewables and refocusing on oil and gas development amid investor pressure and shifting market dynamics.

Most recently, the activist group Follow This, which paused its campaign for stronger emissions reduction commitments from major oil and gas companies in April 2025. This decision was influenced by declining institutional support and evolving political dynamics.

Nonetheless, resistance to the diminishing of climate targets has been seen in a couple of cases: Triodos Bank left the NZBA after the alliance dropped its 1.5 degrees target; almost a quarter of BP shareholders rejected the BP chair on the grounds of dropping the company's climate commitments; and in late April the New York Pensions Funds increased its demands on net zero targets to its asset managers.

This story aims to keep track of the most recent developments on corporate shifts and back downs on climate commitments, including changes in investor and asset managers climate-related strategies.

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。