abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

هذه الصفحة غير متوفرة باللغة العربية وهي معروضة باللغة English

الدعوى القضائية (SLAPP)

31 مايو 2016

Greenpeace International

الحالة: DISMISSED

Date lawsuit was filed
31 مايو 2016
دقة التاريخ
جميعها صحيحة
Greenpeace International
مدنية
لا ينطبق
مجموعة مهتمة بقضايا البيئة
الدعاوى القضائية: الدعاوى ضد المشاركة العامة (SLAPPs)
محامي المدعي: Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
الدعاوى القانونية: تشويه السمعة, الابتزاز, التآمر, التدخل المؤدي للضرر, العلامات التجارية
عدد المدعى عليهم: 5
مبلغ التعويض: $300,000,000
القائم برفع الدعوى: Company
ضحية الاعتداء: Group, Organisation or Institution
موقع رفع الدعوى: الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية
موقع الحادثة: الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية
Resolute Forest Products كندا قطع الأشجار والخشب, الورق والكرتون رد الشركة
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية مكاتب المحاماة رد الشركة

المصادر

On May 31, 2016, Resolute Forest Products (“Resolute”) filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia against Greenpeace International, Greenpeace Inc., Greenpeace Fund Inc., STAND.earth (formerly ForestEthics), and five individual staff members of these organizations. The complaint included federal racketeering claims, trademark, defamation, and tortious interference claims under Georgia law (the case was later transferred to the US District Court for the Northern District of California). Resolute alleged that the defendants misrepresented facts in order to induce donations, and used false claims to “extort” Resolute customers. Resolute claimed at least $300,000,000 in damages. On October 16, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all of the logging company’s claims with leave to amend. The court also awarded the defendants their attorneys’ fees pursuant to the California anti-SLAPP statute. Resolute filed a repackaged version of its original complaint three weeks later. On January 22, 2019. the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all claims under RICO and most of the state law claims (claims related to 294 of the 296 statements at issue). The case was dismissed in full against STAND.earth, Greenpeace Fund, and two individual defendants. We invited the company to respond; it did. A rejoinder from the organization is available here.