WWF contends that SOCO has violated multiple provisions of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises in terms of both the project’s design and its implementation to date. WWF alleges that: SOCO has failed to take due account of the need to protect the environment given DRC’s commitments under the World Heritage Convention; SOCO has sought and/or acceptedƒcontractual exemption that could unduly constrain the DRC government’s ability to protect human rights and the environment, and could be detrimental to the pursuit of sustainable development in Virunga; SOCO has failed to provide evidence that it has conducted appropriate and systematic human rights due diligence; SOCO has failed to provide the public with adequate, measurable, verifiable and timely information about the potential social and environmental impacts of its oil exploration activities; and SOCO has failed to provide relevant stakeholders with meaningful opportunities for their views to be taken into account in consultations that are free of intimidation.[refers to COHYDRO]