abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Jan 2004

Author:
Surya Deva, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, The University of Sydney, Australia, in Melbourne Journal of Intl. Law

Acting Extraterritorially To Tame Multinational Corporations For Human Rights Violations: Who Should 'Bell The Cat'?

Regulation of MNCs by home states through extraterritorial laws is a recent addition to the measures under review in this ongoing search [for an effective regulatory model for multinationals]. The presentation of a Bill in the United States House of Representatives on 7 June 2000 marked an attempt to adopt the extraterritorial model of regulation. This was soon followed by the introduction of a similar Bill in the Australian Senate on 6 September 2000...this article seeks to examine the provisions and the omissions of the two Bills.