hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

Biwater-Tanzania arbitration

Sewage systemIn August 2005, Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. (BGT), a private water company, filed a request for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) regarding a contractual dispute with the United Republic of Tanzania.  The dispute arises out of agreements entered into by BGT and Tanzania for the operation and management of the Dar es Salaam water system.  In May of 2005, Tanzania terminated the contract with BGT for its alleged failure to meet certain performance guarantees set forth in the agreements.  BGT brought the case before the ICSID stating that Tanzania’s termination had breached their agreements and resulted in an illegal expropriation of BGT’s investment. 

Tanzania launched the project to overhaul the water and sewerage infrastructure of Dar es Salaam with funding from the World Bank.  To receive this funding, Tanzania was required to award this work to a private contractor.  In 2003 the project was awarded to BGT.  BGT is a joint venture created by Biwater International Limited and HP Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. for the purposes of the Tanzanian project; Biwater owns 80% of BGT and Gauff owns 20%. 

The proceedings of this arbitration have been kept confidential, and the details of the parties’ legal arguments are not available to the general public.  However, ICSID granted a group of interested parties (Tanzanian and international NGOs) permission to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the Tanzanian Government.  This amicus brief was filed in March 2007; its full text is available via a link below.  The brief argues that BGT’s acts and omissions caused its investment to fail and that investors in the water sector have a heightened level of responsibility because the success of a business venture in this area has a direct impact on the achievement of an essential human right - the right to clean and safe water.  The brief further argues that taking into consideration human rights and sustainable development, termination of the contract by a government, if done in good faith to prevent the worsening or abuse of human rights, should not be found to be a contractual breach, especially when a contract’s purpose was to promote and enhance the achievement of such rights.

On 24 July 2008, the arbitral tribunal issued its final decision in this case.  The tribunal declared that the Tanzanian Government had violated the terms of its bilateral investment treaty with the UK.  However, the tribunal declined to award BGT the monetary damages requested.

- Water: Campaigners cheer defeat of Biwater's £10m Tanzanian claim, Xan Rice, Guardian [UK], 29 Jul 2008
- The Water Margin, Xan Rice, Guardian [UK], 16 Aug 2007
- Flagship water privatisation fails in Tanzania, John Vidal, Guardian [UK], 25 May 2005

- [PDF] Bricks without Straw: the Confidentiality Order in Biwater Gauff, James Chalker, Sustainable Development Legal Assistance, Mar 2007

- Biwater: Biwater Response to Outcome of ICSID Arbitration, 28 Jul 2008
- Biwater: Statement About Biwater Gauff Tanzania, 1 Dec 2005
- World Bank: [PDF] Dar Es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation Project - proposed amendments to legal agreements 17 Feb 2006
- World Bank: [PDF] Tanzania - Dar es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation Project, 4 Feb 2003

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited and United Republic of Tanzania [ICSID proceeding]
- [PDF] Amicus Curiae Submission by Lawyers’ Environmental Action Team, Legal and Human Rights Centre, Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, Center for International Environmental Law, and International Institute for Sustainable Development, 26 Mar 2007

- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Award, 24 Jul 2008 [final decision of arbitral tribunal declaring that Tanzania had violated the terms of its bilateral investment treaty with UK but declining to award monetary damages to BGT]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Concurring and Dissenting Opinion, 24 Jul 2008
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 5, 2 Feb 2007 [granting amicus curie status to Lawyers’ Environmental Action Team, Legal and Human Rights Centre, Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, Center for International Environmental Law and International Institute for Sustainable Development]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 3, 29 Sep 2006 [imposing certain confidentiality requirements on the parties]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 1, 31 March 2006 [partially granting BGT’s request for provisional measures to preserve its rights with regard to certain bank accounts, assets and documents]

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Lawsuit
18 February 2014

Biwater-Tanzania arbitration

Author: Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

In August 2005, Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. (BGT), a private water company, filed a request for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) regarding a contractual dispute with the United Republic of Tanzania.  The dispute arises out of agreements entered into by BGT and Tanzania for the operation and management of the Dar es Salaam water system.  In May of 2005, Tanzania terminated the contract with BGT for its alleged failure to meet certain performance guarantees set forth in the agreements.  BGT brought the case before the ICSID stating that Tanzania’s termination had breached their agreements and resulted in an illegal expropriation of BGT’s investment. 

Tanzania launched the project to overhaul the water and sewerage infrastructure of Dar es Salaam with funding from the World Bank.  To receive this funding, Tanzania was required to award this work to a private contractor.  In 2003 the project was awarded to BGT.  BGT is a joint venture created by Biwater International Limited and HP Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. for the purposes of the Tanzanian project; Biwater owns 80% of BGT and Gauff owns 20%. 

The proceedings of this arbitration have been kept confidential, and the details of the parties’ legal arguments are not available to the general public.  However, ICSID granted a group of interested parties (Tanzanian and international NGOs) permission to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the Tanzanian Government.  This amicus brief was filed in March 2007; its full text is available via a link below.  The brief argues that BGT’s acts and omissions caused its investment to fail and that investors in the water sector have a heightened level of responsibility because the success of a business venture in this area has a direct impact on the achievement of an essential human right - the right to clean and safe water.  The brief further argues that taking into consideration human rights and sustainable development, termination of the contract by a government, if done in good faith to prevent the worsening or abuse of human rights, should not be found to be a contractual breach, especially when a contract’s purpose was to promote and enhance the achievement of such rights.

On 24 July 2008, the arbitral tribunal issued its final decision in this case.  The tribunal declared that the Tanzanian Government had violated the terms of its bilateral investment treaty with the UK.  However, the tribunal declined to award BGT the monetary damages requested.

- Water: Campaigners cheer defeat of Biwater's £10m Tanzanian claim, Xan Rice, Guardian [UK], 29 Jul 2008
- The Water Margin, Xan Rice, Guardian [UK], 16 Aug 2007
- Flagship water privatisation fails in Tanzania, John Vidal, Guardian [UK], 25 May 2005

- [PDF] Bricks without Straw: the Confidentiality Order in Biwater Gauff, James Chalker, Sustainable Development Legal Assistance, Mar 2007

- Biwater: Biwater Response to Outcome of ICSID Arbitration, 28 Jul 2008
- Biwater: Statement About Biwater Gauff Tanzania, 1 Dec 2005
- World Bank: [PDF] Dar Es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation Project - proposed amendments to legal agreements 17 Feb 2006
- World Bank: [PDF] Tanzania - Dar es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation Project, 4 Feb 2003

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited and United Republic of Tanzania [ICSID proceeding]
- [PDF] Amicus Curiae Submission by Lawyers’ Environmental Action Team, Legal and Human Rights Centre, Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, Center for International Environmental Law, and International Institute for Sustainable Development, 26 Mar 2007

- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Award, 24 Jul 2008 [final decision of arbitral tribunal declaring that Tanzania had violated the terms of its bilateral investment treaty with UK but declining to award monetary damages to BGT]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Concurring and Dissenting Opinion, 24 Jul 2008
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 5, 2 Feb 2007 [granting amicus curie status to Lawyers’ Environmental Action Team, Legal and Human Rights Centre, Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, Center for International Environmental Law and International Institute for Sustainable Development]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 3, 29 Sep 2006 [imposing certain confidentiality requirements on the parties]
- ICSID: [PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania - Procedural Order No. 1, 31 March 2006 [partially granting BGT’s request for provisional measures to preserve its rights with regard to certain bank accounts, assets and documents]

Article
25 July 2012

Human rights and investment law: the potential for resolving disputes

Author: Allison Lindner, Independent Legal Researcher, in Lawyers for Better Business (L4BB)

It is an interdisciplinary medley of international and domestic investment law, natural resource law; land law and human rights law. The common thread is property rights and how these relations are articulated in a web of conflicting legal frameworks in Africa. He is also concerned with how power imbalances affect local communities living near natural resource project locations...That the analysis hinges on property rights makes it accessible to both human rights and commercial lawyers, whether civil or common. Legal academics, policy makers and researchers would also do well here.

Read the full post here

Article
31 December 2008

ICSID Tribunal Finds Tanzania To Have Violated Bilateral Investment Treaty But Declines To Award Any Damages

Author: Andrea K. Bjorklund, Professor of Law at Univ. of California, Davis, in ASIL Insight (American Society of Intl. Law)

Privatization of public services, such as the provision of utilities and waste disposal facilities, has led to many investment disputes... Biwater Gauff (a joint venture of two European companies [via an operating company, City Water]...)...was awarded the bid [for the private operation & management of Dar es Salaam's water & sanitation system]... City Water...underestimated the difficulty of the project and failed to allocate sufficient managerial and financial resources to it. City Water requested an increase in the Operator Tariff, but Tanzania rejected the request... Relations between the government and Biwater Gauff continued to deteriorate...[and] mediation failed. Between May 13, 2005 and June 1, 2005,...[Tanzanian] government authorities took certain steps, including repudiating the lease contract and occupying City Water’s facilities... Biwater Gauff then brought a claim under the bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Tanzania...

Read the full post here

Article
28 October 2008

[PDF] Business & Human Rights Resource Centre launches world’s first online portal profiling human rights lawsuits against companies

Author: Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Today the non-profit Business & Human Rights Resource Centre launches a free online portal – the first to bring together and demystify lawsuits from across the world alleging human rights abuses by companies. The portal summarises in non-legal language over 35 cases and the positions of each side, with more cases to be added soon. It also presents special commentaries by experts...Companies in profiled lawsuits include: AngloGold Ashanti, Barclays, BHP Billiton, Biwater, Blackwater, BP, Cambior, Cape PLC, Chevron/Texaco, Chiquita, Coca-Cola, Daimler, Deutsche Bank, Dow/Union Carbide, Drummond, DynCorp, ExxonMobil, Firestone, Ford, Freeport-McMoRan, IBM, Mitsubishi, Nike, Occidental, Rio Tinto, Severstal, Shell, Standard Chartered, Talisman, Trafigura, Total, UBS, Wal-Mart, Yahoo!

🚫Read the full post here

Article
29 July 2008

Water: Campaigners cheer defeat of Biwater's £10m Tanzanian claim

Author: Xan Rice, Guardian [UK]

Anti-poverty campaigners were yesterday celebrating the failure of a British water company to win up to £10m for a bungled privatisation in Tanzania. Biwater…took Tanzania's government to the World Bank's business tribunal in 2006, arguing its assets had been expropriated and its contract illegally terminated. Campaigners say the contract was forced on Tanzania and accused the Biwater-led consortium - City Water [whose owners also include Gauff Ingenieure & Superdoll Trailer] - of performing worse than the state-run utility. The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment of Disputes (ICSID) in The Hague ruled Tanzania's government had violated its treaty with the UK by expelling City Water. But the tribunal said there were no damages to award as the company's value was "nil" at the time of expropriation.

Read the full post here

Article
28 July 2008

Biwater Response to Outcome of ICSID Arbitration

Author: Biwater

Biwater is pleased that an ICSID Arbitral Tribunal has upheld its claim that the Government of Tanzania broke the terms of the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) between the UK and Tanzania on four separate counts….However, although the Tribunal awarded declaratory relief in respect of the…violations (in the form of a declaration of wrongdoing), it decided not to award damages on the technical ground that it did not consider that Biwater had proved that the violations in question caused loss…. While the award of declaratory relief is a welcome vindication of Biwater's claim against Tanzania, the Tribunal's failure to provide a remedy through a damages award is frustrating.

Read the full post here

Article
24 July 2008

[PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. Republic of Tanzania - Award

Author: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

[Text of final decision of ICSID arbitral tribunal]

Read the full post here

Article
24 July 2008

[PDF] Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. Republic of Tanzania - Concurring and Dissenting Opinion

Author: International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes

[Full text of concurring and dissenting opinion of arbitral tribunal.]

Read the full post here

Article
11 January 2008

Tanzania wins £3m damages from Biwater subsidiary

Author: Ashley Seager, Guardian [UK]

Tanzania has won more than £3m from a subsidiary of British company Biwater in a long-running dispute over a controversial contract to run the water system of Dar es Salaam. The Tanzanian government privatised its water system and handed control to Biwater subsidiary City Water Services in 2003. But then problems with the water supply led the government to seize control back from CWS in 2005…. Now a London tribunal has thrown out a case brought by CWS under the rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law…[finding] that water and sewerage services had deteriorated under CWS's management….

Read the full post here

Article
17 October 2007

How top London law firms help vulture funds devour their prey

Author: Ashley Seager & James Lewis, Guardian (UK)

…Vulture funds buy up sovereign debt issued by poor countries at a fraction of its face value, then sue the countries in courts…for their full face value plus interest… A paper prepared for the IMF/World Bank meetings this week shows there are now $1.8bn of lawsuits against poor countries… [T]he report…shows that of the 24 countries that have received debt cancellation under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries initiative, 11 have been targeted for legal action by private creditors… Top London law firms [refers to Allen & Overy (A&O), Weil Gotshal, Dechert] are reaping the benefits from bringing many of the vulture funds' cases to court in London… [includes comments by Allen & Overy, Dechert, and Weil Gotshal; also refers to Donegal International, Elliott Associates, Walker International, Biwater, Kensington International]

Read the full post here