Hide Message

Updating the Resource Centre Digital Platform

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is at a critical point in its development. Our digital platform is home to a wealth of information on business and human rights, but hasn’t had a visual refresh for a number of years.

We will soon be updating the site to improve its usability and better serve the thousands of people that use our site to support their work.

Please take an advance peek at our new look, and let us know what you think!

Thank you,
Alex Guy, Digital Officer

Find Out More Hide Message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
en/experts-reflect-on-the-zero-draft-of-the-legally-binding-treaty-on-business-and-human-rights#c188455

Briefing Paper on the Zero Draft: Unpacking Arguments Against the Treaty

Author: Treaty Alliance Germany, Published on: 15 May 2019

On 26 June 2014 the UN Human Rights Commission approved a resolution to form a working group (Open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, OEIGWG) to elaborate a legally binding instrument to regulate the activities of transnational corporations and other companies with regard to compliance with human rights standards (‘Treaty Process’)...

The working group has met four times since then. In July 2018 the Ecuadorian chair submitted a first draft treaty (Zero Draft) which was debated at the fourth meeting of the UN working group in October 2018. The states were invited to comment on this draft until end-February 2019.

The present briefing paper discusses objections raised in political debates to the overall process or to contents of the Zero Draft and formulates proposed solutions.

1. Argument on the significance of an international regulation generally

2. Argument on scope of application (with reference to Art. 3.1 in combination with Art. 4.2 Zero Draft)

3. Argument for taking into account the UN Guiding Principles (relating to Art 9. Zero Draft)

4. Argument on legal liability (relating to Art. 10 Zero Draft)

5. Argument on the relationship between human rights and trade and investment agreements (relating to Art.13 Zero Draft)

 

Download the full document here