abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

30 Mar 2007

Author:
[commentary] John Hilary, Guardian [UK]

Corporate abuse: Efforts to hold multinational businesses accountable for human rights violations are meeting stiff resistance

Do multinational corporations have human rights responsibilities? To most of us this seems like a no-brainer... [The] UN secretary-general's special representative has just presented his long-awaited report to the UN's human rights council... [The] international business community...has argued that corporations should not face binding human rights obligations. Instead, business has spoken out in favour of weak voluntary principles... [The] British government has consistently sided with business against the human rights community... One thing is clear... The international community...must work towards a proper framework of binding regulations to protect against corporate human rights violations. Voluntary self-regulation is not an option.