abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Article

1 Jun 2025

Author:
JARO Institut für Nachhaltigkeit und Digitalisierung

EU: Jaro Institute publishes new survey with 1,350 company decision-makers on German supply chain law and CSDDD

Photo: bbtomas, Getty Images via Canva

"LKSG and CSDDD in a reality check: Opinions of 1,350 business decision-makers", June 2025

Due diligence obligations: perspective of the German economy

  • Important issue: Human rights & environmental standards are highly relevant for companies
  • LkSG works: More than 50% of large companies invest in human rights and environmental protection
  • Competitive advantage: 50% of German companies see advantages over EU competitors because of the LkSG
  • Strategically relevant: 44% see long-term advantages for EU companies over US- & China competitors
  • Strengthening EU business locations: More investment for supply chains in the EU
  • Clear stance: majority in favour of EU-wide harmonization of due diligence obligations
  • No relief lever: hardly any need for action on due diligence obligations
  • Planning risks: "Omnibus" leads to uncertainty for 50% of the companies surveyed
  • Barrier to investment: Legal uncertainty burdens 48% of participating companies

Our conclusion: companies are committed to due diligence