abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

12 Sep 2024

Author:
Ric Stevens, NZ Herald

Napier developer Malcolm Herbert’s delay in migrant worker employment case ‘inexcusable’, says judge

See all tags Allegations

A judge says a property developer used “inexcusable” delaying tactics while trying to overturn $96,000 in penalties for multiple employment law breaches involving migrant workers.

Napier developer Malcolm Herbert and his company MAH Enterprises will now have to pay almost another $10,000 in court costs after he failed to follow up on a challenge to penalties award in the Employment Court.

A labour inspector from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) began an investigation in 2021 after an employee alleged he had not been paid for the annual holidays he was entitled to.

The inspector’s report concluded that MAH had breached the law 42 times by failing to keep proper wage, time, holiday and leave records. It said 13 employees did not receive annual leave entitlements and, for another worker, MAH was using an individual employment agreement that did not comply with the law...

Employment Court Chief Judge Christina Inglis has now said that MAH Enterprises subsequently made no attempt to follow up on the legal challenge...

She said the delay was “inordinate and inexcusable”, similar to what happened at the ERA hearing.

“The ongoing delays are prejudicing the 14 employees at the centre of the proceedings who were to be paid a portion of the penalties awarded by the authority and who are facing ongoing uncertainty as to their position,” Judge Inglis said.

“They are entitled to closure.”...

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.